The reason for existence of such sites is just to raise the "creditability" of certain domains and having a lot of Backlinks & clicks - thus, being listed by Google at the foremost top. The SEO-Cancer has brought us link farming. May be this is not be known to you - if it's already used by you, then: I, for me, automatically use the advanced search, with exclusion of certain terms within the search results. If you get onto that page, you can define the search in detail. There is a link somewhere for "advanced search ". Nowadays, no +/- anymore accepted in the search, but. In the early times, one could use "+" and "-" to define the search in detail. But that implied the reduction of some Poweruser functions. The search has been made more easy for everyone by Google. :)įirst, I wish you & your wife all the best.įor me it's the same. I'm a happy user of ! Definitely worth a Netflix sub per month, at least for programmers. They just did not know how destructive this conflict of interests would later be. Type of reason and historical experience with other media, we expect that advertisingįunded search engines will be inherently biased towards the advertisers and away from the needs of the It is clear that a search engine which was taking money for showing cellular phoneĪds would have difficulty justifying the page that our system returned to its paying advertisers. Of its high importance as judged by the PageRank algorithm, an approximation of citation importance on Risk associated with conversing on a cell phone while driving. ForĮxample, in our prototype search engine one of the top results for cellular phone is "The Effect ofĬellular Phone Use Upon Driver Attention", a study which explains in great detail the distractions and The advertising business model do not always correspond to providing quality search to users. Ĩ Appendix A: Advertising and Mixed MotivesĬurrently, the predominant business model for commercial search engines is advertising. Some trivia: Sergey Brin and Lawrence Page wrote about this in their 1998 paper "The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine". > Most of the problems appear, superficially at least, to be consequences of advertising I don't know if I'm the only one, but as a long time Google power user, I find using the search increasingly frustrating. Most content, again, feels like it wasn't written by subject matter experts but article writers copy-pasting solutions from multiple different articles. Outside of Stackoverflow results (which, thankfully, are at the top of the page), most articles are written for a broad, beginner audience (like a React article starting with a tutorial on installing React). It's the same problem with technical searches. You can also tell that the article is trying its best to "play it safe" and list out only the broadest possible range of results. You can tell from a glance that the article wasn't written by a subject matter expert. Almost all the top pages are the same article written in five different ways, and each only has the most basic, broad information. The medical results are absolutely hopeless. Most of my searches lately have either revolved around a couple of medical issues (my wife's slightly complex pregnancy, and my own neck injury) or technical problems. Google used to be my first stop whenever I had to research anything, but of late, I've increasingly found myself appending site: or site: to get any meaningful results.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |